That makes it invalid input to any module that requires input to comply with
RFC5322, pure and simple.
Well, OK, with the stipulation that no existing MUA I have ever seen is
such a module.
I think if it becomes well-known that users of MUA 1 are easier to phish
than users of MUA 2, a lot of people will gravitate to the safer
implementation, don't you? I sure would.
Aw, come on. How many millions of people still use Outlook Express on
Windows XP? Switching MUAs is painful, people rarely do it.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html