ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing

2010-10-15 08:29:55
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:17:15 +0100, John R. Levine <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

We seem to be talking past each other here.

I don't see anyone proposing a deep dive into 5322 validation.  But 4871
already says you MUST sign the From: header.  Why is that OK, but saying
you MUST NOT sign or validate something with two From: headers is not?
We're not suggesting anything that would invalidate existing bits on the
wire, after all.

+1

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>