On 10/14/2010 09:45 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
Unless there's *really* something they can't figure out without protocol
help, I'm not sure what the point of this is. This double added From thing
is trivial to detect with the current spec.
Well, yeah. That's why I don't understand why people are so opposed to a
SHOULD saying they should.
Because the audience who ought to be dealing with the larger problem has little
to
nothing to do with the audience that would have to deal with that MUST/SHOULD.
It's a useless requirement to put on DKIM.
If you really think this is such a great big problem, maybe you should be
banging the drums at MAAWG or other venues where the correct set of ears
is potentially listening.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html