ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing

2010-10-14 09:49:27
What is essential is that it perform the task of validating and delivering a 
signing domain that is associated with a collection of bits.  Anything that 
defines how to do this is essential.  Anything that can make this break needs 
to 
be covered, especially if there are ways to protect against the breakage.

But isn't the problem that the signing domain is being incorrectly
associated with a different collection of bits?

Mark.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>