Hi Murray,
At 10:56 22-10-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I understand your point, but what I'm saying is that the DNSDIR
people, on reviewing RFC5451, were not satisfied with that line of
reasoning, resulting in a DISCUSS from the OPS AD until I went back
and indicated for every use of "domain" which thing I meant. I'm
simply trying to avoid that.
And that is what the suggested change is for as it has a reference to
what "thing" the document is talking about.
Then I guess I don't understand the basis for the suggested
change. The citation you
This is covered in John Levine's message.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html