Jim Fenton wrote:
It also adds more complexity to the specification and to
implementations. Besides, DK compatibility should become less of an
issue with time since it is a legacy protocol.
+1
IMO, DKIM is already a "complex" technology to properly implement and
integrate into a system, especially with key management. We decided
not to deal with DomainKeys. We don't add it or verify it.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html