On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:01:17PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely allegedly wrote:
On 13/Oct/10 20:45, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 12:54:23 pm Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
If we can extract DKIM from the equation entirely and the problem remains,
how is it a DKIM problem?
If the DKIM signature doesn't verify after signed headers have been altered,
then it's not.
Correct. And the way that it fails to verify is h=from:from.
Which strikes me as an ugly hack. Given that most headers should only
occur once and given that a lot of signers sign most headers doesn't this
suggestion degenerate to
h=from:from:subject:subject:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:list-id:list-id?
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html