ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Protecting messages, not MUAs, MTAs, or anything else

2010-10-20 10:03:15
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:32:29 +0100, Hector Santos <hsantos(_at_)isdg(_dot_)net> 
wrote:

John R. Levine wrote:

So, uh, can we agree that Jim's SHOULD language to tell people to do
this is a good idea?

Yes. +1.  I think I was the first to agree with Jim's input and didn't
see much follow up except you and maybe another person.

Maybe Barry can provide a repeat of the exact change proposal and get
a preliminary show of hands.

I would say +1, but only if it was a MUST rather than a SHOULD (which I  
think it can be provided you do not ask for excessively meticulous 5322  
checks).

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>