ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt

2010-10-13 12:24:31
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:46:42 +0100, Barry Leiba 
<barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org>  
wrote:

There are only two significant changes between -01 and -02 ... most of
the changes are just updating the references.  The substantive changes
are:
1. The addition of the paragraph that begins "Similarly, a message
that is not compliant with RFC5322," near the end of 5.3.

Which is a start, but not nearly enough.

2. The addition of 8.14.

Which also is a start, but not nearly enough.

For the record, I am totall OPPOSED to this WGLC unless and until there is  
adequate normative wording to cover these loopholes (and the current  
change to 5.3 is not "adequate").

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>