On 12/Oct/10 17:47, Barry Leiba wrote:
3) Philosophical conflictive parenthetical sentence:
(This can also be taken as a demonstration that DKIM is not designed
to support author validation.)
Yeh, that's the only part I agree on (though not with the reasoning
that follows). I'm ambivalent about having that parenthetical
statement in there. I'd like to see some consensus about whether to
leave it or keep it.
+1 for leaving it, it is just distracting in that context.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html