ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments

2010-10-15 09:16:02
from [Scott Kitterman] [Permanent Link] 
On Friday, October 15, 2010 10:04:40 am MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:

why don't we just deprecate "l="?


Yes.  Please.

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
Next by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
Next by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, John Levine
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]