-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Alessandro
Vesely
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 2:13 AM
To: Barry Leiba
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments
Because of the SHOULD, existing verifiers can still be considered
compliant. Thus, it may still make sense for a signer to still put
"h=from:from". Why did Jim remove that advice?
It's a specific example of a more general statement, and the general statement
is still there in what Jim said.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html