ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt

2010-10-12 12:32:11
  On 10/11/10 11:46 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Jim Fenton<fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>  
wrote:
  There's a Working Group Last Call in effect for -01.  Should we:

- Continue to direct comments at -01
- Comment on -02 instead
- or will the WGLC be restarted on the -02 draft?
I think it's not necessary for us to restart, but reviews should now
go against -02.

Thanks for clarifying.

Dave, could you then update the diffs at 
http://dkim.org/specs/rfc4871-to-bis-diff.htm to show the diffs from -02 
to RFC 4871?  It would be nice to see all of the differences in one place.

-Jim

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>