-----Original Message-----
From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:30 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01
As a part of the IETF implementation report for Draft Standard, I
suspect it is
distracting or possibly worse, since it implies that that bit of data
is relevant to the protocol and its deployment.
I agree that's true. But on the flipside, this particular statistic pointed
out that the slight text change you proposed in your previous message might be
a good idea for the DS version. It might therefore actually be useful to
include as justification for such an edit should anyone ask.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html