-----Original Message-----
From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:28 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-
report-01
[...]
to be:
1.1. Signing Identity
...
The signing identity specified by a DKIM signature is entirely
independent
of the identities present in any particular header field. The
interpretation of
a match that is possible between the signing identity and the
identifier in
another field is outside the scope of DKIM.
Works for me.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html