Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01

On 10/1/2010 10:20 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I should've read the whole thread before replying.  If consensus is to keep 
> the statistic in, I'm fine with Jeff's proposed language.
As a statistic in a software reporting tool, I think it's a fine a useful 
tidbit 
to include.

As a part of the IETF implementation report for Draft Standard, I suspect it is 
distracting or possibly worse, since it implies that that bit of data is 
relevant to the protocol and its deployment.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html