On 10/15/2010 10:45 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
In this case, I don't recollect an objection, so thus far, it seems
to me that Dave's correct on this one. I think its perfectly fine
for an editor to try to close off things that seem to have a clear
consensus like this.
Stephen -- the issue here is the procedural one that Dave ignores
*any* input *at all* from people he filters. It doesn't matter
whether it's a typo -- ignored. This has been true of every document
in this working group that he has edited. In the case of 4871-bis
that means that I can have *no* input whatsoever, even though I'm
one of the authors of 4871 and have made substantial contribution
to the community with stats, running code, and general insight about
what running DKIM was like in a large enterprise setting.
I'm fine with Dave not liking me as an individual and choosing to
ignore me, but not with an editor's hat on. If he can't put that
aside as an editor, he should recuse himself and step down.
Mike, nothing I say here makes any difference because of who
gates the changes.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html