ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition

2010-10-15 13:37:20


On 15/10/10 18:32, Barry Leiba wrote:
I'd like to ask a procedural question of the chairs: Dave killfile's
many participants, therefore any consensus he sees will merely reflect
the echo chamber of his own making.

So I strongly object on procedural grounds for authors who kill file
people in general, and for those asking for consensus in particular.

Mike, you needn't object unless the chairs put people in our
kill-files, and I can assure you that we don't.  There's nothing that
requires any participant to read the posts by any other participant --
although as a chair, I'd rather the editors did read all posts related
to their documents -- but it's up to the chairs to evaluate consensus.

Right. (Though having so much mail is almost as effective as a
killfile;-)

In this case, I don't recollect an objection, so thus far, it seems
to me that Dave's correct on this one. I think its perfectly fine
for an editor to try to close off things that seem to have a clear
consensus like this.

Therefore, the consensus that goes into the document will reflect what
the chairs see.

Indeed,
S.


Barry, as chair
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>