ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition

2010-10-15 12:39:01
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Hector Santos
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:17 AM
To: IETF DKIM WG
Cc: Barry Leiba
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition

So I strongly object on procedural grounds for authors who kill file
people in general, and for those asking for consensus in particular.

In fact, I have been looking at RFC 2026 Section 6.5.1 (a) as an
reason to appeal based on the principal key editors are knowingly
filtering input from WG participants.  I know both Dave and Murray are
doing this and both are key editors of this document.  This creates
problems and also unnecessarily increasing the volume of input from
people who don't believe they are being heard.

I was threatened with legal action on the basis of tortious interference if I 
continued to disagree with one participant's technical arguments or 
professional conduct on this list.  I have thus elected not to engage that 
person any further in any discourse whatsoever on the list absent a withdrawal 
of that threat and some kind of guarantee of future civility.

I have serious doubts the IESG would find fault in that choice on appeal.  The 
IETF has dealt severely with other participants that have taken that attitude 
in the past.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>