On Oct 14, 2010, at 5:09 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 10/13/2010 1:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
I propose removing section 3.6.1.1 in its entirety.
Not only do I support this, but I think we can remove all references to
DomainKeys, except for the obvious historical reference to its role as input
to
DKIM.
At the time DKIM was developed, worrying about compatibility with, and
transition from, DomainKeys was essential. Now it isn't.
+1
We've done a surprisingly good job of getting the word out that DK is over and
DKIM is the future.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html