Well, if you want to introduce semantic changes why not just change
the meaning of h=from:to: to be semantically identical to
h=from:from:to:to:
...
I assumed that the proposal applied only to headers rfc5322 says cannot be
duplicated.
That is a constraint that was not stated.
It is now.
This probably requires a substantive change to the specification. I'm not
clear
whether it would force the spec to re-cycle at Proposed.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html