On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:07:15AM -0700, Dave CROCKER allegedly wrote:
On 10/18/2010 3:31 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 15 October 2010 11:53:51 -0400 Dave
CROCKER<dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
On 10/15/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Delany wrote:
Well, if you want to introduce semantic changes why not just change
the meaning of h=from:to: to be semantically identical to
h=from:from:to:to:
This would mean that it is /never/ ok to add a listed header field after
signing. Adding would /always/ break the signature.
I assumed that the proposal applied only to headers rfc5322 says cannot be
duplicated.
That is a constraint that was not stated.
It is now.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html