On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:06 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post
comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
it's ready to go.
I have reviewed it, and it looks ready to go.
+1
Regarding Hector's complaint, I think a separate usage report focused on
1st/3rd party signing practices may be appropriate -- but I don't think it
makes sense to hold up the advancement of the DKIM base spec for that.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html