-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 4:41 PM
To: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on
draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
Regarding Hector's complaint, I think a separate usage report focused
on 1st/3rd party signing practices may be appropriate -- but I don't
think it makes sense to hold up the advancement of the DKIM base spec
for that.
Actually the data are still there. It was just reworded, as per Jeff's
suggestion:
Identities: 73.8% of the signatures observed included a "d=" value
matching the domain in the From: field.
...so this is a non-issue.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html