ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

2010-10-04 21:32:10
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 4:41 PM
To: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on 
draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

Regarding Hector's complaint, I think a separate usage report focused
on 1st/3rd party signing practices may be appropriate -- but I don't
think it makes sense to hold up the advancement of the DKIM base spec
for that.

Actually the data are still there.  It was just reworded, as per Jeff's 
suggestion:

   Identities:  73.8% of the signatures observed included a "d=" value
      matching the domain in the From: field.

...so this is a non-issue.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>