-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:48 AM
To: Hector Santos
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats
-- 25.9% : dkim_body_hash_mismatch
I was going to ask...
I should probably add a recording which of these has List-IDs, but I
think the high body hash failures are most list systems.
...but you answered.
We do have that recorded. Of 10,561 signatures for which the body hash failed,
8,219 (77.8%) appeared to be list traffic (i.e. had a "List-*" header field or
a "Precedence: list" field).
Breaking that down further: Of the 8,219, 6,614 (80.4%) were author domain
signatures, so the rest were presumably list signatures (or something else).
57 of them failed even in the presence of an "l=" tag.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html