At 10:57 06-10-10, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
the place where the 5322 people roost (I hear that working group
shut down as part of IETF reorg) and at least say... "hey, this came
up in the context of 4871 and we believe
That working group did not shut down; it took a pause.
At 11:50 06-10-10, Hector Santos wrote:
So the 5321/5322 filtering layer approach works fine (but we lose
interesting mail <g>). But I would not have done this if I was not
made aware of this problem by Alt-N who discovered this security hole.
This case was reported in an implementation several years ago as part
of a different issue.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html