ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE

2010-10-06 00:28:54
from [SM] [Permanent Link] 
Hi Stephen,
At 16:46 05-10-10, Stephen Farrell wrote:

Assuming that "recommending" above maps to a (putative)
"MUST/SHOULD" statement in 4871bis, I'd be interested in
opinions as to whether such a change might slow progress
to draft standard, or be detrimental to current deployments.


Such a change may affect the progress to draft standard.

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy
Next by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Mark Delany
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, J.D. Falk
Next by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Charles Lindsey
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]