-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Scott
Kitterman
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 10:01 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing
We want to re-submit DKIM Signing to Proposed Standard, in order to fix an
edge condition that is only a theoretical issue and only fixes a problem
that is actually outside of the scope of what DKIM is trying to achieve?
Detecting modification in transit is outside the scope of what DKIM is
trying to achieve?
Doesn't DKIM try to detect modification of the portion covered by the hashes,
which is unchanged in this scenario?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html