[ietf-dkim] double header reality check

> So it establishes a false sense of resolving a security issue.
Hmmn.  I could reiterate for a fourth time why the double header thing is 
only a security issue in the context of DKIM, but there's clearly 
something else going on that prevents people from getting it.
Here's a question: in the absence of DKIM, does anyone think that doubled 
headers present a security problem?  If so, what is the problem, and how 
has it been addressed in the past?
R's,
John

PS: For the moment, please treat "smells like spam" as not a security 
problem.  If it's a spam sign, does any spam filter currently look for it?

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html