ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE

2010-10-05 21:35:12



PS: Note that I'm saying nothing about whether or not this
issue should be mentioned in 4871bis.


FWIW:

Adding to a specification, by trying to protect against behavior that is 
already 
illegal is wasteful, redundant and  opens the door to an infinite path of 
similarly unnecessary provisions.  Plainly bad specification methodology.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>