My perception of the rough consensus is that we do want to make
some statements about the issues discussed in the draft. However,
the only truly normative thing upon which we appear to agree is that
MLMs should sign their mail. I would rather we produce this more
complete document at a lower status than a one-paragraph BCP saying
only that.
If we do that, I think that in fairness to people reading it, we
should say explicitly which recommendations are based on practice, and
which are paper designs a/k/a wild guesses. Unless I've missed some
implementations, we have considerable experience with lists signing,
and some anedotal experience with damage from ADSP, but everything
else falls into the latter category.
I'm also scratching my head about the bits that are intended to help
people work around faulty DKIM implementations. Are there other IETF
documents that do that?
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html