-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Alessandro
Vesely
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:59 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about
multiple header issues)
On 26/Oct/10 06:58, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
a verifying module might return a syntax error code or arrange not to
return a positive result even if the signature technically validates.
-1. How does "might" differ from "MAY"?
In a bunch of ways. In particular, though, it is deliberately not RFC2119
language, partly because that's not generally done in Security Considerations
since that section is discussion (informative) rather than protocol (normative).
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html