ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again

2010-10-13 15:52:24
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 1:15 PM
To: DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

But like I said, I was ranting.

Jeff, an identifier that's not bound to something is useless. It's
like "Mike" just bouncing around the aether. Until it binds to
something, it's not providing anything useful and certainly not
something you'd want to alter the message disposition.

It is bound to 3 header fields. To, Date and Message-ID. 

If I can go around stamping your three signed header fields and your identifier 
on anything I please, I think the value of that stamp and identifier will 
quickly approach zero or even go negative.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>