Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after s

>  If Big-Bank had been added after signing, verifiers are already
> authorized to delete that field from the message, according to the
> current PS.  Isn't that enough?
I don't know any DKIM verifier that modifies the message, and I doubt that 
many people would want to use one.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for 
Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html