ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Working Group Last Call on 4871bis// A-label requirement

2011-04-20 04:38:20

On 19 Apr 2011, at 22:43, Douglas Otis wrote:

On 4/15/11 7:25 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
Instead, conversion to A-label form, or any other special encoding
required by a particular name-lookup protocol, should be done only by
an entity that knows which protocol will be used (e.g., the DNS
resolver, or getaddrinfo() upon deciding to pass the name to DNS),
rather than by general applications that call protocol-independent
name resolution APIs.

Wow. This change would both be incompatible with 4871, and would put 
non-ASCII 8-bit characters into DKIM-Signature: headers, thereby 
making them invalid under RFC 5322 and getting them smashed by any 
7bit MTA.
A and AAAA records serve as a discovery mechanism for SMTP rather than 
using MX records to ensure independence from DNS.

Not for this site, they don't. At least, not AAAA records. I suspect most sites 
don't use IPv6 for message transport, and therefore don't use AAAA records for 
discovery. 

When we do eventually get to IPv6 deployment, we won't accept mail from domains 
with neither A nor MX records, even if they do have an AAAA record. As long as 
there are significant numbers of sites without IPv6, you'll need an MX record 
or an A record to accept mail.

What we will do, of course, is accept authenticated submissions from clients 
with only AAAA records. Again, they won't be permitted to use return-path 
domains with neither A nor MX records.

For both OS X and 
Windows local name resolution services use UTF-8. Should email be 
expected to work between two hosts having non-ASCII host names resolved 
using UTF-8?

When SMTP allows the display of non-ASCII local-parts, the domain 
portion should also use UTF-8 as well. The DKIM verification process 
should therefore confirm the proper conversions. No one expects people 
to visually validate signatures, so why expect them to also validate 
puny-codes?

What does http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-2.3.5 say about 
FQDN. Would http://バスケ指導.meblog.biz/ qualify as a FQDN?

-Doug


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

-- 
Ian Eiloart
Postmaster, University of Sussex
+44 (0) 1273 87-3148


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html