-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Hector Santos
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 5:32 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Cc: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary
I think this message by Barry in March 2009 summarizing a conference
call between Pasi, Stephen and Barry nicely captures the upper/lower
layers, ADSP, i= and outputs conflicts that continue today:
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q1/011314.html
I think that message doesn't say a single thing about layers. It looks
entirely procedural to me.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html