-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:08 PM
To: Charles Lindsey
Cc: DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output requirements
+ Verifiers SHOULD ignore those signatures that produce a PERMFAIL
+ result (see Section 7.1), acting as though they were not present
in
+ the message. ...
s/Verifiers SHOULD ignore/Identity assessors SHOULD ignore/
(and probably in other places too). Verifiers are explicitly instructed
to return PERMFAIL/TEMPFAIL), and "returning" something is evidently
inconsistent with "ignoring" it.
+1
Since this is already somewhat mushy, might I suggest:
Verifiers MAY decline to report, and identity assessors SHOULD ignore, ...
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html