-----Original Message-----
From: John R. Levine [mailto:johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 10:50 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output
Might not be list traffic. But I have data for that too. Count of
signatures with "l=" that did or didn't appear to pass through an MLM:
+----------+--------------+
| count(*) | mailing_list |
+----------+--------------+
| 77246 | 0 |
| 78853 | 1 |
+----------+--------------+
That's just strange. Most of the l= signatures don't cover the whole
body, and half of those didn't go through a mailing list?
I suspect it's use of "l=" by a signer without regard to whether or not the
mail is heading to an MLM. For example, OpenDKIM's antecedent had that as an
option; only the evolution to OpenDKIM allowed you to be more specific.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html