ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output

2011-05-06 13:48:13
+----------+--------------+
| count(*) | mailing_list |
+----------+--------------+
|    77246 |            0 |
|    78853 |            1 |
+----------+--------------+

That's just strange.  Most of the l= signatures don't cover the whole
body, and half of those didn't go through a mailing list?

I suspect it's use of "l=" by a signer without regard to whether or not 
the mail is heading to an MLM.  For example, OpenDKIM's antecedent had 
that as an option; only the evolution to OpenDKIM allowed you to be more 
specific.

Except that doesn't explain why l= doesn't cover the entire body.

Signing or verifying bug?  Clever spammer replaying signed mail and 
getting away with it?  Forwarders of some sort that add a footer but 
otherwise don't look like mailing lists?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet 
for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>