http://www.opendkim.org/stats/report.html#l_tag
You can see the count that have "l=" smaller than the final message size as
well as the "l=0" ones, and how many of those passed or failed.
That's out of 155972 signatures that used "l=", and 4.36M total signatures
observed, in just over eight months of data.
Hmmn. If my arithmetic is right, about 95% of l= signatures didn't cover
the whole body, and only a few of those were l=0. Your users must
subscribe to different mailing lists than I do.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet
for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html