-----Original Message-----
From: John Levine [mailto:johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 5:37 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] 23 again (sorry John) was Output summary -
proposing ODID "Originating Domain Identity"
For what it's worth, our stats show that it is in use on 3.58% of
signatures received since August.
Do you have enough data to know in how many of those 3.58% the body
wasn't the same length as the l= value ?
Looking at my much smaller archive, it appears that in most cases the
l= matches the body length so ignoring l= would make no practical
difference.
Yes, that's here:
http://www.opendkim.org/stats/report.html#l_tag
You can see the count that have "l=" smaller than the final message size as
well as the "l=0" ones, and how many of those passed or failed.
That's out of 155972 signatures that used "l=", and 4.36M total signatures
observed, in just over eight months of data.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html