So if we wish to discourage "l=" useful, some of these text needs to
be reworded, like this one in section 3.5 [...]
I don't think the proposed text adds or clarifies anything that isn't already
there.
The semantics and use of "l=" are pretty well defined already.
I agree.
Barry, as participant
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html