ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output

2011-05-07 08:05:18
So if we wish to discourage "l=" useful, some of these text needs to
be reworded, like this one in section 3.5 [...]

I don't think the proposed text adds or clarifies anything that isn't already 
there.
 The semantics and use of "l=" are pretty well defined already.

I agree.

Barry, as participant

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>