ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output

2011-05-08 02:06:23
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 7:00 AM
To: Hector Santos
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output

The 6% using "l=" needlessly is a red flag.

Yep.  Happily, we (where "we", here, mostly means Murray, but some
others as well) are collecting stats.

I don't know that I would "red flag" it so fast.  There are local policy 
options that can mitigate the damage, and the stats don't say whether or not 
those are in effect.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>