ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #17

2011-05-08 12:32:05


On 4/27/2011 2:21 AM, SM wrote:
I thought that the advancement of the specifications from Proposed to
Draft would not be too much of an effort as there are existing
implementations of RFC 4871.  But then, this is the DKIM WG.


The effort is primarily created by folks choosing to respond about issues that 
have no constituency, are not real problems, and/or have already been settled.

Folks can choose not to respond, when someone else raises a concern that is not 
an actual problem with the specification.

Responding makes it look as if the issue is real and significant. The fact that 
someone chooses to keep raising settled or non- issues does not obligate others 
to respond.

That would make things go considerably quicker.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html