Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24

2011-05-08 12:37:55



On 5/6/2011 11:14 AM, John Levine wrote:

I appreciate the work that Doug and Charles put into their proposal,
but for reasons already discussed, I think we should leave section
6.1 as is in -09.



+1

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, J.D. Falk Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, Dave CROCKER <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, Barry Leiba

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #17, Dave CROCKER
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] l= statistics was 23 again (sorry John) was Output, John R. Levine
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, J.D. Falk
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Ticket #24, Barry Leiba
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]