-----Original Message-----
From: Hector Santos [mailto:hsantos(_at_)isdg(_dot_)net]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 9:25 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] MLM and C14N
This is a software problem,
You mean the MLM who is ignorant of DKIM meta data for the past "40
years?"
Yes, that's what I mean.
not something that needs to be solved by creating a protocol
extension.
Isn't that what you are doing in this MLM I-D, creating a DKIM
"protocol extension" for MLMs?
No, that's not what that document does.
Creating a new canonicalization is a protocol extension. It creates a slippery
slope wherein we are constantly creating or adjusting canonicalization
algorithm(s) to deal with new cases we find and want to accommodate. It's a
bad idea.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html