On Jul 8, 2011, at 7:05 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
I'm not seeing much agreement on any changes to Murray's final draft, so
may I suggest that it's good enough and we should ship it? The potential
benefit of the proposed changes doesn't impress me as worth the amount of
argument they're provoking.
+1
Having the same argument again and again hasn't and won't convince anyone to
change their minds.
--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html