ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3192)

2012-04-16 07:01:43
+1


/d

--

Dave Crocker
bbiw.net



-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org>
Cc: "dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net" <dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net>, 
"tony+dkimov(_at_)maillennium(_dot_)att(_dot_)com" 
<tony+dkimov(_at_)maillennium(_dot_)att(_dot_)com>, 
"msk(_at_)cloudmark(_dot_)com" <msk(_at_)cloudmark(_dot_)com>, 
"stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie" 
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>, 
"turners(_at_)ieca(_dot_)com" <turners(_at_)ieca(_dot_)com>, 
"barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org" <barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org>, 
"john(_dot_)hawthorn(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com" 
<john(_dot_)hawthorn(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>, "ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org" 
<ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3192)

I've checked this, and it's correct.  We copied the examples from 4871, and
made the editorial error of adding a space without changing the hash.  I'll
mark it as Verified if i hear no objections soon.

Barry

On Saturday, April 14, 2012, RFC Errata System wrote:


The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6376,
"DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6376&eid=3192

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: John Hawthorn <john(_dot_)hawthorn(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com 
<javascript:;>>

Section: Appendix A

Original Text
-------------
  From: Joe SixPack <joe(_at_)football(_dot_)example(_dot_)com <javascript:;>>
  To: Suzie Q <suzie(_at_)shopping(_dot_)example(_dot_)net <javascript:;>>
  Subject: Is dinner ready?
  Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 21:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
  Message-ID: 
<20030712040037(_dot_)46341(_dot_)5F8J(_at_)football(_dot_)example(_dot_)com<javascript:;>


  Hi.

  We lost the game.  Are you hungry yet?

  Joe.

Corrected Text
--------------
  From: Joe SixPack <joe(_at_)football(_dot_)example(_dot_)com <javascript:;>>
  To: Suzie Q <suzie(_at_)shopping(_dot_)example(_dot_)net <javascript:;>>
  Subject: Is dinner ready?
  Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 21:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
  Message-ID: 
<20030712040037(_dot_)46341(_dot_)5F8J(_at_)football(_dot_)example(_dot_)com<javascript:;>


  Hi.

  We lost the game. Are you hungry yet?

  Joe.

Notes
-----
This text appears three times, in A.1., A.2., and A.3.
Notice the double space after "game.", which renders the body hashes from
A.2. and A.3. invalid.
The corrected text is the same as that in RFC 4871.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC6376 (draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures
Publication Date    : September 2011
Author(s)           : D. Crocker, Ed., T. Hansen, Ed., M. Kucherawy, Ed.
Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
Source              : Domain Keys Identified Mail
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>