Hi, Murray,
On 16-11-16 02:45, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
There's been a lot of great feedback here. I just cranked out an
update based on the discussion so far:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kucherawy-dkim-rcpts-01
I forgot to update the title of Section 3, but other than that I think
I captured what's been discussed. Please let me know what I've missed.
the intended status field is empty, but do you have some intended status
in mind or not yet?
/rolf
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html