On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Michael Storz
<Michael(_dot_)Storz(_at_)lrz(_dot_)de> wrote:
Thanks, I see. That means the recipient is bound to the message and an
attacker cannot delete or change the new tags. Great solution, I like it,
though I do not like the consequences when this extension will go into
production.
You may not need to worry about that. We've reached a point where I think
we can legitimately say, "We took a serious look, and this is the best we
could come up with. It has some pretty ugly side effects. Are you sure
you can't just stop signing spam?" And absent a compelling answer to that
question, there's no need to roll this out even as an experiment.
-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html